During world war 1 it was a crime to criticize the president or the war effort. Would a court today find such a law as a constitutional valid interpretation of the dirt amendment? Why or why not

A court today would not find that to be constitutionally valid.

Explanation:

There is a multitude of laws that override the censorship of press, especially to criticize the president. When there are restrictions in free speech, citizens may feel as though they are being dis-empowered. The first amendment allows for free speech, and even if the sitting president feels that it may be harmful, they have no authority to stop free speech.

international economic development agencies harm poorer nations by encouraging them to serve as exporters to wealthier nations.

unlimited governmental powers

explanation:

unlimited governmental powers was not a feature of the new state governments. state governments in the u.s. are structured in the same way as the federal government, with executive, legislative, and judicial branches.