Which of these statements BEST explains why the decision made in the “Dred Scott” case nullified the Compromise of 1850 and “popular sovereignty”?
A) A state has the right to secede if the federal government tried to abolish slavery there.
B) African-Americans could not be considered citizens therefore no state could allow them to vote.
C) Slaves were considered property and federal government could not disallow slavery in any state.
D) Only the Supreme Court could determine whether a state could allow slavery not the Legislative branch.

The correct answer is C.

Explanation: Dred Scott was an African American slave who sued the person who claimed to "own" him for his freedom. The case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court and the Supreme Court ruled against Dred Scott stating that a slave was "property," and had no rights as a citizen of the United States.

answer: born in saint-dié, in the vosges department, france, he studied law, and was called to the bar at paris in 1854,[2] but soon went into politics, contributing to various newspapers, particularly to le temps. he attacked the second french empire with great violence, directing his opposition especially against baron haussmann, prefect of the seine department. a series of his articles in le temps was later republished as the fantastic tales of haussmannlaxupa (1868).[2]

explanation:

because its important to learn about other countries and how high tech they are compared to us. also its good to learn about other cultures and how ours differs and in common also we need to learn about companies that we still buy since they ship it here.