Looking at the evolution of media and how it has shifted or changed perspective on state politics, why do you believe there is the appearance of declining state news, in favor of national coverage (even if that is not the case)?
How does this shift in focus make voters more or less politically informed?

It is true that the evolution of media has led to people being more informed about national politics than state politics. There are several possible reasons for this. For example, it is possible that this is a consequence of support for local media declining. This means that some local news agencies have been closed, making it impossible for them to report on news. Another possible reason is the fact that the country is becoming more interconnected. This can mean that people are more interested in what happens in other regions of the country because they feel close to them.

The consequence of this is that people might lose interest in local politics, which can lead them to be uninformed or politically inactive. This can be very dangerous, as people are more closely affected by state policies than by federal ones.

number 1 is a)

bloodiest single day of war   |   gettysburg

where the civil war ends for good   | appomattox court house

the first major land battle; south wins | bull run/manassas (va)

gives union control of the mississippi river |   vicksburg

lee’s first tactical defeat; big win for union |   fort sumter1

with lincoln's re-election |   atlanta

south wins

splits confederacy in two for the duration of the war,

antietam