Fourth Amendment Precedent

Match each case with the precedent it established.

Horton v. California

Officers can legally carry out a stop and

frisk

Mapp v. Ohio

Officers can gather evidence that is in

plain view

Terry v. Ohio

Convictions cannot be based on

evidence from an illegal search.

Please see below for answer.

Explanation: Matching each case with the precedent it established we have ,

Terry v. Ohioofficers can legally carry out a stop and frisk

Horton v. CaliforniaOfficers can gather evidence that is in plain view

Mapp v. Ohioconvictions cannot be based on evidence from an illegal search.

The Fourth Amendment ensures only  a fair process for  searches and  for seizures and it  states that "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon Probable cause."

Terry v. Ohio

so the story tells of someone named kaushik choudhuri, but he does not narrate the story, a girl named hema does. hema tells the story in a second person point of view because you (the reader) are supposed to be the boy named kaushik.

here's an excerpt i found: "i was ushered into the fitting room, your mother watching approvingly as i took off my coat and sweater and tried on the bra."

source: