Based on what you have learned about racial segregation and the arguments of george wallace and dr. martin luther king, jr., explain why you think dr. king's arguments proved to be more effective than george wallace's.
Even though George Wallace's argument was structured well and used some of the same sources as Dr. King, Dr. King's message about brotherhood was more convincing. George Wallace argued for freedom for the states to do as they liked, but no one should be allowed to ignore the rights of individuals and we should all be treated equally. Wallace realized this is his own life.

I think it's

"Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s arguments were more effective because they were a persuasive appeal to people's emotions. When Dr. King spoke about love of fellow man and using unifying language it appealed to people's emotions. Also, his use of non-violence in the face of violent oppression encouraged sympathy for his cause."

Explanation:

Sample Response: Even though George Wallace's argument was structured well and used some of the same sources as Dr. King, Dr. King's message about brotherhood was more convincing. George Wallace argued for freedom for the states to do as they liked, but no one should be allowed to ignore the rights of individuals and we should all be treated equally. Wallace realized this is his own life.

Explanation:

an economic reason that the south needed a reconstruction plan is that plantations, factories, and other businesses were destroyed during the war.

he is known for discovering   the fossil of a female hominin australopithecine   known as "lucy" in the afar triangle region of hadar, ethiopia.

hope this !

have a great day!