One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?
one historian did not examine primary sources
one of the historians' research has serious flaws
they used different secondary sources for research
their interpretations of historical facts vary
Answers: 1
Another question on History
History, 21.06.2019 20:40
In what year did vladimir lenin and the bolsheviks seize power in russia? 1885 1900 1917 1961
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. —"the gettysburg address," abraham lincoln which quotation correctly uses an ellipsis to shorten lincoln’s words?
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
The main reason that the royal society of london developed the modern form of peer review was to: award grant funding. decide on promotions for researchers. streamline the publication of conference proceedings. control the quality of published papers.
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What had the biggest effect on the daily lives of south carolina is during the civil war?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another...
Questions
Medicine, 23.12.2020 19:20
Geography, 23.12.2020 19:20
Mathematics, 23.12.2020 19:20
History, 23.12.2020 19:20
Spanish, 23.12.2020 19:20
Spanish, 23.12.2020 19:20
Mathematics, 23.12.2020 19:20
Social Studies, 23.12.2020 19:20
Chemistry, 23.12.2020 19:20
English, 23.12.2020 19:20
Mathematics, 23.12.2020 19:20
