One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?
Group of answer choices
one historian did not examine primary sources
one of the historians' research has serious flaws
they used different secondary sources for research
their interpretations of historical facts vary
Answers: 3
History, 21.06.2019 15:00
How did thomas paine's pamphlet common sense convince reluctant americans to abandon the goal of reconciliation with britain and accept that separation from britain — independence — was the only option for preserving their liberty?
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
Select two reasons for the division of power in a limited government. limit misuse of power protect the rights of individuals leaders stay in power leaders inherit power control freedom of speech
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Decide whether each statement is true of the indian national congress, the all muslim league, or both
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Describe the impact of the neolithic revolution on civilization
Answers: 1
One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another...
Chemistry, 12.04.2021 20:40
Social Studies, 12.04.2021 20:40
Social Studies, 12.04.2021 20:40
Mathematics, 12.04.2021 20:40
Mathematics, 12.04.2021 20:40
Geography, 12.04.2021 20:40
History, 12.04.2021 20:40
History, 12.04.2021 20:40
Mathematics, 12.04.2021 20:40