subject
History, 27.05.2020 23:59 ndh64

One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another historian argues that modern law is based on the legal system of the Roman Republic. What could be the reason for the difference of opinion between these experts?

Group of answer choices

one historian did not examine primary sources

one of the historians' research has serious flaws

they used different secondary sources for research

their interpretations of historical facts vary

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:00
How did thomas paine's pamphlet common sense convince reluctant americans to abandon the goal of reconciliation with britain and accept that separation from britain — independence — was the only option for preserving their liberty?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
Select two reasons for the division of power in a limited government. limit misuse of power protect the rights of individuals leaders stay in power leaders inherit power control freedom of speech
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Decide whether each statement is true of the indian national congress, the all muslim league, or both
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Describe the impact of the neolithic revolution on civilization
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
One historian writes that the Code of Hammurabi was the most important source of modern law. Another...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.04.2021 20:40
Questions on the website: 13722360