Evaluate the extent to which rulers of the early modern era differed in their methods of establishing authority. PLEASE HELP ME THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ESSAY!!!

The rulers of the early modern era were differentiated in their methods of establishing authority in absolute monarchs that possessed kingdoms due to their conquests and imperialistic ideas.

The early modern era has been considered from the 15th century to the 18th century in Europe. During that period in the history of humanity, Europe was ruled by powerful kings that ruled over many territories in different parts of the world.

It was the time of navigation and exploration that made possible the discovery of new routes to India, Africa, and the discovery of the Americas. Kings invested a lot of money in this exploration.

it was the way to conquer new lands and exploit their raw materials and natural resources for the benefit of their kingdoms. These Kings -more than leaders- were absolutists that exerted total power over their subjects, who had limited or no rights.

To know more about the rulers of the modern era, refer to the link below:

link

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Rulers of the early modern era differed in their methods of establishing authority in that most of them were absolute monarchs that possessed huge kingdoms due to their conquests and imperialistic ideas.

The early modern era is considered to be from the 15th century to the 18th century and the Age of Enlightenment in Europe. During that period in the history of humanity, Europe was ruled by powerful kings that ruled over many territories in different parts of the world. It was the time of navigation and exploration that made possible the discovery of new routes to India, Africa, and the discovery of the Americas. Kings invested a lot of money in this exploration because it was the way to conquer new lands and exploit their raw materials and natural resources for the benefit of their kingdoms. These Kings -more than leaders- were absolutists that exerted total power over their subjects, who had limited or no rights.

on this day in 1939, in response to hitler’s invasion of poland, britain and france, both allies of the overrun nation declare war on germany.

the first casualty of that declaration was not german—but the british ocean liner athenia, which was sunk by a german u-30 submarine that had assumed the liner was armed and belligerent. there were more than 1,100 passengers on board, 112 of whom lost their lives. of those, 28 were americans, but president roosevelt was unfazed by the tragedy, declaring that no one was to “thoughtlessly or falsely talk of america sending its armies to european fields.” the united states would remain neutral.

as for britain’s response, it was initially no more than the dropping of anti-nazi propaganda leaflets—13 tons of them—over germany. they would begin bombing german ships on september 4, suffering significant losses. they were also working under orders not to harm german civilians. the german military, of course, had no such restrictions. france would begin an offensive against germany’s western border two weeks later. their effort was weakened by a narrow 90-mile window leading to the german front, enclosed by the borders of luxembourg and belgium—both neutral countries. the germans mined the passage, stalling the french offensive.

explanation:

ad the excerpt and i will gladly answer