Which of the following best explains the Dred Scott case and how it affected the debate about slavery?
Dred Scott was a slave owner who learned his slave was living as a free man in a northern state. He argued that the slave should be returned to him to continue working on his plantation. He won his case which caused a revolt between citizens in the North and South.
Dred Scott was a slave who argued that because his owner brought him into a free area, he should be free. The Supreme Court ruled he was "property," and citizens could bring property wherever they chose. This decision enraged anti-slavery activists.
Dred Scott was a white abolitionist who murdered a group of pro-slavery men. He was tried in court in a southern state and found guilty. Citizens in northern states argued for his release, and the resulting battles between the states led to "Bleeding Kansas."
Dred Scott was a slave arrested in Boston and forced to board a ship back to his owner in Virginia. Boston citizens purchased his freedom in a northern court, and he was allowed to remain in Boston as a free citizen. This decision enraged slave owners in the South.
Answers: 1
History, 21.06.2019 13:30
Which of the following week is not characteristic of a nation-state? a. nationalism b. sovereignty c. a national identity c. numerous village kings
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Acivilization reaches its high point during its stage. a)birth b)growing pains c)adulthood d)senior
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
The articles of confederation allowed congress to: make and borrow money. declare war. create a postal service. all of these choices are correct.
Answers: 3
Which of the following best explains the Dred Scott case and how it affected the debate about slaver...
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 02:37
English, 06.05.2020 02:37
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 02:37
Geography, 06.05.2020 02:37
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 02:37
Biology, 06.05.2020 02:37