Read these two scenarios, and then answer the question that follows. Scenario 1 Hector has worked in a small furniture factory for 10 years. He hasn’t had a pay increase in eight years. He frequently works 10 days in a row before getting a day off, and he often works extra hours with no extra pay. He knows that if he quits, the company will just hire someone else to replace him. Scenario 2 Victor has worked in a steel factory for 10 years. He hasn’t received a pay raise in the 10 years he has been there and often works two weeks before getting a day off. While speaking with his coworkers, he realizes that hardly any of them are satisfied with this situation. So they approach their manager as a group and threaten to quit unless the company increases their pay and gives them days off on a weekly basis. Realizing it would be difficult to replace all of the factory workers, the company gives in to their demands. What is the difference between these two situations?

Lets start by taking a look at each scenario.

1. Single person is not content with his current position, he decides not to mention anything due to a fear of losing his job.

2. Here, Hector talks to several people and they agree. They threaten to go on strike unless the company gives in.

The difference is that in the first, Hector is by himself, and in the second, Hector is with other people with all of them threatening to quit.

I hope this helps! :)

i thing that the best option is a.they feared it would cause a second economic collapse.

one of the most negatives aspects of the new deal was that it upset the balanced federal budget and led to a huge deficit for the nation while at the same time failed to end increasing unemployment. roosevelt's program, based on keynesian theories of economics, called for massive government spending to stimulate the economy. as he   failed to do this with large tax increases; large sums of money were borrowed to fund new deal programs. when the economy showed some improvement, roosevelt was concerned about inflation, and ordered cuts in government spending. unfortunately, he did so at a time when the new social security tax had cut people's disposable income. businesses were too afraid of spending, and the economy in 1937 was in worse shape than in 1929. at the end of that year, two million people were unemployed.

the answer would be c