What is the key idea in this passage ?

The correct answer is B. There should be no taxation without representation

Explanation:

The excerpt presented explains that citizens cannot be forced to pay taxes or similar, this can be seen in "No man should be compelled to make or yield any gift, loan, benevolence, tax, or such like charge". Additionally, the author adds at the end of the sentence this should be not be allowed except if there is "common consent by act of Parliament"; this shows taxation cannot be imposed, except if the government and the Parliament represent citizens and there is an agreement.

Indeed, this excerpt belongs to the Petition of Right (1628) a document in which citizens requested the protection of their rights, including not being taxed without representation, which was an issue during this time. Thus, the key idea of this passage is "There should be no taxation without representation".

hello there!

the graphics that you have attached within the question, indicates that few people in bolivia work in industry according to its labor force.

however, the graphic that is on the right side of the picture shows the gdp sector in bolivia. this gross domestic product is a macroeconomic magnitude   that shows the monetary value of all finished goods and services within a country's borders in a specific time period. in this case, the graphic is showing the monetary value in each sector -agriculture, industry and services- of bolivia in 2012.

so, although the first graphic located at the left side indicates that not so many people work in industry, this is the second most important sector according to the gdp metrics because of the monetary value that impacts on its country. it does not need to be the most valuable one. if it makes an impact on the country's economy, it will be definitely crucial to it.

an interest group is an organization whose members share common concerns, and try to influence government policies that impact those concerns. elected officials frequently complain about the influence of "special interests" on american politics.