Subsidiary Alliance is a system through which the British came to control the affairs of the Indian states without actually annexing them. Which of the following is not a feature of subsidiary alliance? a. Any ruler who entered into the alliance would give money or some territory for the maintenance of the British contingent in their territory.
b. They would keep a British Resident at their respective capitals.
c. They would pass a State of an issueless ruler (ruler not having a natural heir) to the English Company.
dThey would not employ any non-English European and if there were any, they would dismiss them.

Correct

c.They would pass a State of an issueless ruler (ruler not having a natural heir) to the English Company.

Explanation:

As the name said, subsidiary alliance was adopted by the British inorder to control the resources, and people of India without actually the colonisation and annexation of the country.

The option C was never a feature of the subsidiary alliance.

rosevelt. 1973. "slaves everywhere"

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.