What is NOT one of the assumptions that may lead someone to avoid thinking critically about moral issues? Group of answer choices That because there are multiple opinions, each one must be equally valid That if we cannot be certain about a moral position, we cannot judge it better or worse than others. That moral reasoning is unrelated to the kind of practical reasoning we use in everyday life. That critical thinking and taking a stand on a moral issue is compatible with open-mindedness and intellectual humility.

That moral reasoning is unrelated to the kind of practical reasoning we use in everyday life.

Explanation:

In simple words, critically thinking is a very difficult psychological process for an individuals and doing it for a topic like moral issues, which is subjective in its own manner, makes it way more difficult.

However, saying that moral reasoning is difficult due to its differences with practical world application is completely wrong as morals are clearly defined by social norms on a basic level and one can conduct and implement them easily on a certain level.

congress seems to have some powers the states do not have. they can do some pretty big things, they can declare war. and they can lead armies and navies. they also have the power to create a mail delivery system, make foreign treaties, print and borrow money, (both states and congress can do that)and make rules for certain places, i think they said the western states.  

the new government has been a big to growing their country! they are getting new land over west. and they are passing laws which to settle boundary issues.  

although most of this information sounds good for them, bad for us, there are some weaknesses from their plan. the people are still having issues with taxes and trading goods, they also don't have a main leader such as a chief or a president. they also have trouble with currency. the states are printing out so much money the national currency is beginning to be worthless. so things are getting hard to handle over here.  

some of the americans like the new government and think that even if they could ask about changing it they would be ignored. daniel shays got a group of people who hated the new government and decided to attack. this could become either worse or better.

(one-paragraph analysis)  

i think that they may start a war or some sort of big attack to make them change their government. most americans just don't want to discuss it. but i think that daniel man will speak up for them. if they do scare them they will get a better government and be able to deal with their issues better! i think that is what is going to happen next in the u.s., sincerely

lorelei     hope this i had some from the internet u   can report me if u want