The supreme court’s use of selective incorporation

The correct answer is C. Takes a subjective case-by-case approach to the question of incorporation.

Explanation:

In the U.S. law, the selective incorporation is a principle used to limit the laws enacted by states, especially those that are against the Bill of Rights or the federal laws. This principle or policy has been applied in different cases through the years to limit the actions of states; for example in 1940 in New York States the Cantwells family was arrested for preaching in their neighborhood but the Supreme Court determined this was against religious freedom and limited the actions of the States. Additionally, this does not have a general approach or objective procedure, instead, each case is analyzed individually to determine if the principle of incorporation should be applied. Thus, selective incorporation "takes a subjective case-by-case approach to the question of incorporation."

a, c, & d are correct:

they wanted lands to settle the extra population.

they wanted new markets for english goods.

they wanted to avoid civil war.

worcester v. georgia, legal case in which the u.s. supreme court on march 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on native american land. andrew jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision form the basis for most subsequent indian law in the united states.