Morality Dilemma #1: Two-Car Crash You're involved in a two-car crash on your way to work one morning in which you accidentally hit and kill a pedestrian. As you get out of the car, you are intercepted by a tearful woman who seems to think that she hit and killed the pedestrian. You're not sure why she thinks she hit the person, but she is convinced. There's only you, the woman, and the person you hit on the road; there are no witnesses. You know that whoever is deemed responsible will probably be sent to jail. What do you do? What should someone do in this situation?

Claim:
Evidence:
Explanation:

Do you think this decision would make a person truly happy? Truly free? Why or why not?

the hereditary right of a monarch to rule from the mandate of heaven

b) he seized power from the directory and appointed himself emperor

happy to

pls mark as brainliest

a forgein bfvgrebdfkx

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.