Bender uses evidence that United States sent a representative to the Berlin Conference (1884-1885) but that the representative refused to be a signatory to the final agreement, to prove Group of answer choices

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the question does not provide any options, we can say the following.

The United States sent a representative to the Berlin Conference (1884-1885) but that the representative refused to be a signatory to the final agreement because there had been some changes in the domestic politics of the United States. What the US was interested in was in maintaining its politics and economic interests in the region. So the US generally supported the agreements and the partition of the African continent.

During the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885, European superpowers divided the African territories to fulfill their interests. In what was commonly know the "Scramble for Africa," Great Britain, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Germany, and Belgium split African lands to colonize them and exploit their raw materials and natural resources.

in 1803 the louisiana purchase took place, doubling the size of the country. by 1840 almost 7 million americans had migrated westward in hopes of securing land and being prosperous. the belief that settlers were destined to expand to the west is often referred to as manifest destiny.

explanation:

lol, i think so.

explanation: