1. Below is a description of a source you want to use for a world history paper. As you read the description, keep in mind what you've learned about historical thinking
skills and use those skills in evaluating whether or not to use the source.
Is this a trustworthy source for you to use in your paper? Why or why not? In your
answer, make sure to clearly describe the standards you are using to evaluate it. Why
have you determined that it is or is not a trustworthy one to use? (4 points)
Title: "Comparing the Technology of Mesopotamia and Ancient
Egypt." Author: Dr. Jane Smith, Professor of History at the
University of Chicago. Location: Ancient Cultures, a monthly
academic journal.

b. major john c. frémont led a rebellion called the bear flag revolt.

explanation:

during the bear flag revolt, from june to july 1846, a small group of american settlers in california rebelled against the mexican government and proclaimed california an independent republic. the republic was short-lived because soon after the bear flag was raised, the u.s. military began occupying california, which went on to join the union in 1850. the bear flag became the official state flag in 1911.

d

step-by-step explanation:

an inequality is an expression which means more than one number is a solution. we graph the solutions on a number line to show all possible values. we graph using circles and arrows.

this is a filled in circle on -2 so this is . this means only answers c and d are options.

answer d points to the right.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.