What were two effects of the lack of representation of the third estate in the Estates-General? -decreased power of the nobles in the Estates-General
-seizing of lands of the members of the first estate
-separation of the third estate from the Estates-General
-formation of the first National Assembly
-the king’s dismissal of the clergy from the Estates-General

Becar is rt =530668684322973 %23,152 f

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.  

frrr

explanation:

i am i want them to win against ohioo