subject
History, 23.07.2020 01:01 smithsa10630

Whenever archaeologists excavate a site. they use primary and secondary sources to
learn about that site and its artifacts. Are
these research methods enough to give
complete information about the discovered
site or artifact? What other methods do you
suggest to help uncover more information
about the archaeological find? Do you think
that information gained from oral history is
helpful or misleading while concluding an
archaeological find

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Need answers to all questions for this paper
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
How could indian agents profit their assignments?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:20
What is the main problem with the commission form of government? a commissioners often focus on one area. b. each commissioner has too much administrative power. c. the commissioners have trouble working together. d. commissioners are often very corrupt.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
In 1990s the us closed clark air force and subic bay naval station in
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Whenever archaeologists excavate a site. they use primary and secondary sources to
learn abou...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.04.2020 01:05
Questions on the website: 13722367