PLEASE HELP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE Scenario B: A vitamin company, Pro Health (PH), was preparing to launch a new product called "ProBio." It produced 20,000 units of ProBio at a cost of $5 per unit and packaged the product in bottles with labels that prominently displayed the ProBio name. At the last minute, PH learned that an established drug company was already selling a product named ProBio. FDA regulations prohibit drugs with identical names from being sold on the market, with the penalty for noncompliance being a full product recall. Rather than face product recall and all the attendant costs, PH decided to comply with the regulation voluntarily. As a result, the product had to be renamed and rebranded; the label had to be redesigned, remanufactured, and reapplied; and a new advertising campaign had to be formulated and launched. 1. How does this FDA regulation protect consumers? 2. Why did the company voluntarily change its product name? 3. What effect did this regulation have on the company and on consumers?

1. As part of the FDA, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) applies several internal procedures to evaluate the possibility of a brand name before its marketing to avoid medication errors attributed to different items having the same name and by doing so, guarantee the safe use of drugs.

Explanation:

2. They did it because it's mandated by the FDA, and the possibility of a full product recall would be much more costly than rebranding the product.

3. The company had to pay for the rebranding process, but avoided a more costly recalls pocess. They provably learned how important it´s to have a regulatory counsel involved in the branding activities.

they worshiped several is that all it's asking?

1. yes it was the new deal introduced lots of regulations to workers, such as the national labour relations act of 1935 which workers to form unions and protected the members from other laws as well as forcing businesses to listen to the unions and their workers

2.the new deal had a lot of great ideas. but when fdr created the national industrial recovery act. they set prizes and work hours for the workers. the workers made more money ($.40 rather than $.20) but because they did not work as much they would end up making less money. after a while the supreme court found this act to be un-constitutional. but sense the people weren’t   making as much money they could not afford the products. even though the new deal was taken away in 1939 because the government became to powerful, there are still remnants of it in our government. national labor relations, social security, etc… the new deal alone did not end the depression but it the u.s.a dramatically and set them on the right track to recover and become the powerhouse of a country it is today.

3. yes it did bring some relief to those who were willing and able to work and it assisted in terms of creating new and strengthening existing infrastructure.  

4.