subject
History, 23.07.2020 06:01 kukisbae

What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?? A) Criminal defendants who could not afford an attorney had to be provided with one for free.

B) People who were being arrested had to be informed of their Constitutional rights.

C) Prosecutors could no longer engage in plea bargaining with defense attorneys.

D) Evidence obtained in an unconstitutional manner could not be used in court.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Brainliesttt !me : ) how did the japanese economy recover so quickly after world war ii? mass immigration to japan in an effort to rebuild economic and educational reforms passed by the government an economic partnership with korea and china marshall plan dollars stimulated the japanese economy
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
How do state and federal courts differ in the united states
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:20
What governments allow the use of the initiative, the referendum, and the recall? a. all state governments and the federal government b. some state governments and the federal government c. some state governments d. all state governments
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
There are no written records of the first migration of humans to the americas? true or false
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What resulted from the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona (1966)?? A) Criminal defendants...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 29.01.2020 09:43
question
Social Studies, 29.01.2020 09:43
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 09:43
Questions on the website: 13722363