Part C How was Augusto Pinochet viewed by the people of his or her nation? How do you know what the public opinion was? You
might need to find outside sources to answer this question. List any sources you consulted along with your answer.

Augusto Pinochet was a Chilean dictator, who held the de facto presidency of Chile between 1973 and 1990, through the imposition of a military regime that greatly limited the civil liberties of its citizens, carrying out an internal dirty war and a political persecution of leftist political parties. In economic matters, his government carried out liberal measures, seeking to ally himself with the Western Bloc in the framework of the Cold War.

Today, the majority of Chilean society considers that their government was bad, because of the constant human rights abuses committed in the country, where political opponents of their regime were tortured, kidnapped and murdered.

However, parts of the right in Chile still have a positive view of Pinochet. They recognize him for having contributed to economic development. Since the right did not like the development of Chile in the socialist leadership under Allende, the right also recognizes him for having interrupted this development.

Some political analysts believe that the Pinochet regime can be described as fascist, while others believe that Pinochet's liberal economic policies mean that the regime cannot be defined as fascist.

explanation:

these are the geographical features of the gupta empire.

1)it inherited the land owned by the mauryan empire.

2)one obvious difference between the two empires is that the gupta empire was smaller that the mauryan.

3)the gupta empire is located in the northern region of the subcontinent underneath the himalayan and hindu kush mountains.

the gupta empire, marked by extensive inventions and discoveries that contributed to hindu culture, in subjects such as science, technology, engineering, art, dialectic, literature, logic, mathematics, astronomy, religion, and philosophy.

this period was also known as the golden age of india

health care plans in the united states having high costs because they are focusing on providing quality programs for different groups of individuals. the quality of the service is based on money flow received from the members. without this investment, couldn't be possible a constant scientific searching to prevent death and illness caused because of low levels of health investigation. currently, the complaints are not about the highest cost, but about the coverage and benefits to access the necessary health services required by the members.  

besides, if a global health system is established the quality levels will fall down because of the standardized of the health. the access to care will increase but the quality will be low because it depends on the money invested.