URGENT ANSWER Which statement identifies the impact of Richard Nixon’s economic policies on the world?

A. Nixon's decision to convert fiat currency led trading partners to invest int eh Federal Reserve Bank

B. Nixon's change in currency exchange between nations led trading partners to make monetary reforms

C. Nixon's economic policies led the Soviet Union to overspend, leading to an end of the Cold War

Which statement best explains the abuses of power that led to the impeachment of President Nixon?

A. Obstructed Justice through destroying evidence

B. Was in contempt of Congress for failing to appear before the Judiciary Committee

C. abused his power by firing Secretary of State William Rogers

Which statement identifies the impact of Richard Nixon’s economic policies on the world?

B. Nixon's change in currency exchange between nations led trading partners to make monetary reforms

Which statement best explains the abuses of power that led to the impeachment of President Nixon?

A. Obstructed Justice through destroying evidence

Explanation:

Nixon was the president of United States of America between 1972 - 1984.  During the increasing inflation in US, he carried out series of policies in-rder to turn the country around. Some of the most significant were wage and price freezes, surcharges on imports, and the unilateral cancellation of the direct international convertibility of the United States dollar to gold.

Also, during the watergate scandal which was the breaking in into the Democratic National Committee Building by people, he went extra mile in trying to conceal his complicity in the incident not knowing that his actions was captured by the voice activated recordings in the oval office .The investigation of the incident and the review of the recordings after being assessed was what led to him resigning his position as President rather than being impeached.

the vast majority of ballots have been counted nearly two weeks after one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history catapulted donald trump to the presidency.

estimates show more than 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls during the 2016 election, nearly breaking even with the turnout rate set during the last presidential election in 2012, even as the final tallies in states like california continue to be calculated, according to statistics collected by the u.s. elections project.

but among those figures were stark contrasts in key states that swing the election to trump — in ohio, wisconsin, iowa, michigan and elsewhere — indicating the president-elect’s leap from long-shot candidate to the most powerful political position in the world may have happened in part because of apathy toward hillary clinton’s candidacy, especially among the democratic base, several political scientists and organizations monitoring voter turnout told the pbs newshour.

while clinton is leading the popular vote by more than 1.5 million over trump as of sunday, she trails president obama’s 2012 totals by more than 2 million ballots — a chasm that may have cost her the election, said david becker, co-founder of the center for election and innovation and research.

“several million voters didn’t come out to vote,” becker said. “which is telling me that this idea of the trump wave, a huge number of voters shifting over to trump, is certainly not the story.”