This is related to the British rule in India... 'Had the British not defeated the combined forces of Awadh, Bengal and the Mughals, the course of Indian history would have been different'. Justify in five to six points.

Yes if British had not defeated the combined forces of Awadh, Bengal and Mughal then the history of India would have been different because the victory of the British in the Battle of Buxar was very important because it gave British total power in the next round of annexation.

Explanation:

If the British had not defeated the combined forces of Awadh, Bengal and the Mughals, the course of Indian history would be different, because after the battle of Buxar, the British got the Diwani rights of Bengal. ... This gave them their empire of Hindustan and Marathas lost Delhi.

Explanation:

separate but equal was a legal doctrine in united states constitutional law according to which racial segregation did not violate the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution, which guaranteed "equal protection" under the law to all people. under the doctrine, as long as the facilities provided to each race were equal, state and local governments could require that services, facilities, public accommodations, housing, medical care, education, employment, and transportation be segregated by race, which was already the case throughout the states of the former confederacy. the phrase was derived from a louisiana law of 1890, although the law actually used the phrase "equal but separate

hope this : d

1.the 80s' fashion for men was like a mixed bag that had skinny tights, leather pants, and jackets, parachute pants (or hammer pants), leg warmers, very short shorts, ripped and stone-washed denims, frilly puff-sleeved shirts, oddly striped shirts, skinny neck ties, hawaiian shirts, jams, nylon tracksuits in neon colors.

2.

3.colored tvs, malls, telephones

explanation:

google searches