subject
History, 03.08.2020 14:01 nique1024

In Baker v. Carr, the Supreme Court interpreted the equal protection clause to mean that:
A. states had to redistrict to ensure that all votes counted equally.
B. states could redistrict to ensure that rural votes counted more than urban votes
C. states were not obligated to redistrict to ensure all votes counted equally.
D. states could determine when and how often they would redistrict

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 13:30
Who is established rule by assembly and people's court with juries in athens? (a) tellus (b) aristotle (c) solon (d) leonidas
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
Augustine believed that god was all knowing and all powerful. he believed that in order for this to be true, god must directly control everything, meaning that we do not have or (two answers)
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
Why did reagan have the united stars invade grenada
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:50
Who was at the top of the feudal system hierarchy
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In Baker v. Carr, the Supreme Court interpreted the equal protection clause to mean that:
A. s...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 19.05.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722367