Modern debate on the role of the president reflects varied perspectives and uses current events to argue for a more limited to a more expansive use of executive power. Articulate a defensible claim or thesis on whether presidents are justified in their use of formal and informal powers to meet the needs of the role of the office. Can Anyone help me write a thesis for this using a current news event?

i honesty don't know, good luck tho dawg

alliances in ww1 were different from ww2 because the entente in ww1 made up of serbia,russia,france,britan,japan and italy later america  and all allied in a sort of balance of power and too keep germany,austria-hungary,and the ottomans down. russia allied the serbians in order to exert its influence in the balkans while france allied the russians because france was still in dismay and insulted after the defeat to the germans during the unification of germany and britian allied the belgians after the germans invasion of belgium.in ww2 the alliances were in a preemptive attempt to deter any further wars into happening while germany and italy allied since they were insulted and humiliated after the previous war while also sharing a similar ideology of facsim along with japan which all 3 had a want for world domination and agreed to assist one another in the endevours 

explanation:

a

explanation:

you should just come up with the best answers you can nobody is perfect.

explanation: i just want to