Which speaker most supports the ideals of a command economy? Speaker 1: Economies today are too complicated. People should have simple
lives and just do the jobs their families have done for generations.
Speaker 2: Private corporations care only about profits, not about people. The
government should take over the corporations and put the workers in charge.
Speaker 3: The government needs to stop interfering with the economy.
Big companies are rich because they do a good job providing the goods
everyone needs.
Speaker 4: People are too extreme in their economic viewpoints. There should
be a middle ground between total corporate freedom and the government
running the economy
O A. Speaker 3
O B. Speaker 2
C. Speaker 4
ОО
O D. Speaker 1

the correct answer is speaker 3

Explanation:

Because the first person who answered this made me get it wrong.

in 1859, brown and 21 of his followers attacked and occupied the federal arsenal in harper's ferry. their goal was to capture supplies and use them to arm a slave rebellion. brown was captured during the raid and later hanged, but not before becoming an anti-slavery icon. abolitionist and insurrectionist

explanation:

congress seems to have some powers the states do not have. they can do some pretty big things, they can declare war. and they can lead armies and navies. they also have the power to create a mail delivery system, make foreign treaties, print and borrow money, (both states and congress can do that)and make rules for certain places, i think they said the western states.  

the new government has been a big to growing their country! they are getting new land over west. and they are passing laws which to settle boundary issues.  

although most of this information sounds good for them, bad for us, there are some weaknesses from their plan. the people are still having issues with taxes and trading goods, they also don't have a main leader such as a chief or a president. they also have trouble with currency. the states are printing out so much money the national currency is beginning to be worthless. so things are getting hard to handle over here.  

some of the americans like the new government and think that even if they could ask about changing it they would be ignored. daniel shays got a group of people who hated the new government and decided to attack. this could become either worse or better.

(one-paragraph analysis)  

i think that they may start a war or some sort of big attack to make them change their government. most americans just don't want to discuss it. but i think that daniel man will speak up for them. if they do scare them they will get a better government and be able to deal with their issues better! i think that is what is going to happen next in the u.s., sincerely

lorelei     hope this i had some from the internet u   can report me if u want