subject
History, 29.08.2020 01:01 laytonlutz

Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a historian? A) they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
B)They can summarize a huge amount of data that a historian could not sort through alone
C) they can compare and contrast conclusions other historians have made about a time period
D) they can help a historian focus on important themes rather than on a specific piece of evidence

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:30
Many scandinavians immigrated to the united states as a result of the homestead act of 1862, which offered land to independent farmers. this is an example of a push factor, because turmoil in scandinavia encouraged people to leave. push factor, because a new opportunity encouraged people to come to the us. pull factor, because turmoil in scandinavia encouraged people to leave. pull factor, because a new opportunity encouraged people to come to the us.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Which choice describes some of the difficulties john adams faced as presiden
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Martin luther started the protestant movement when he split from the church in 1517. what area of europe was he from?   a.  england  b.  italy  c.  yugoslavia  d.  germany
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
What does president bush say could be the effects of not acting on his proposal
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a hist...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.06.2020 00:57
question
English, 18.06.2020 00:57
question
Mathematics, 18.06.2020 00:57
Questions on the website: 13722361