Why do historians continue to gather historical evidence for even well-known events? They want to find artifacts to sell.
They are looking for evidence to predict the future.
They know that new evidence may lead to new interpretations.
They assume that new technology will prove all of the old theories incorrect

c

Explanation:makes sence but im not sure

the answer is C

Explanation:

trust me slime :)

                 -SLATT

“the battle of stalingrad is not a turning point necessarily in strategic terms, because a lot more has to be done before the soviets can be certain of defeating germany,” says renowned world war ii historian richard overy. the germans had fought nearly a thousand miles across the soviet union to get to stalingrad.

is that it?

explanation: