Which best describes why the sizes of farms in New England were different from farms in the southern colonies? In New England, the soil was rich, the land was flat, and the growing season was long, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies. In New England, the soil was poor, the land was hilly, and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies. In New England, the soil was rich, the land was covered in forests, and the growing season was short, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies. In New England, the soil was poor, the rivers were distant, and the growing season was long, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

well, if you divide by 4 i suppose you get 0

Explanation:

In New England, the soil was rich, the land was flat, and the growing season was long, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies.

Explanation:

jim crow law, in u.s. history, any of the laws in which racial was enforced, in the south between the finish of reconstruction in 1877 and the start of the social liberties development during the 1950s.

jim crow was the name of a minstrel routine( jump jim crow) performed starting in 1828 by its creator, thomas dartmouth ("daddy") rice, and by numerous imitators, including on-screen character joseph jefferson.

the term came to be a defamatory sobriquet for african americans and an assignment for their segregated life. the segregation rule was stretched out to parks, graveyards, theaters, and eateries with an end goal to keep any contact among blacks and whites as equivalents.

it was classified on neighborhood and state levels and most broadly with the "separate yet equivalent" choice of the u.s. preeminent court in plessy v. ferguson (1896).

the main reason the us senate rejected the treaty of versailles was because "european nations wanted to punish germany"

d(:

me and mark as brainliest.