What are some other ways archaeologists and historians might consider dividing the study of the past?

Answer and Explanation:

Historians recorded events when archaeologists arose centuries later and discovered different antiques, for example, a painting, a manuscript, a shield, a sword, and any other thing. They examine these antiques and analyze them.

At earlier times, art was mainly at the hands of the ruling ministers. The archaeologist used to compare the writings of historians with archaeological discoveries. The archaeological pieces manifest the truth or lie of historians in that particular era. Most of the time, artists did not know why they have given much appreciation to work, and those works seem to be unknown.

Archeologist discoveries can be found through the historians as If the archaeologist returns to historians' writings in the old age of that new work. In this way, the world of archeology documents could be understood through historians, and unknown archaeological discoveries could also get into the limelight. Therefore, the historian worked as a crucial part of the work of archaeologists.

answer: if you like this comment you are my freind

explanation: