How do synonyms best help readers to figure out the meaning of unknown words? They restate the word in the sentence with another word or words that have a similar meaning. They provide a word that signals that the author will use a word with the opposite meaning. They provide an example of the word in the sentence, so readers can support their ideas with details. They are listed in a dictionary or thesaurus, making it easy to find the meaning of an unknown word.

a is probably what you are intended to answer, but don't be surprised if the answer is something else.

Explanation:

I hate to start off by being a little cranky, but when you list a question with choices, it would be easy on the eyes if you made each choice into a new paragraph.

I don't know what the best answer is.

a) is certainly true, but it is the best answer. Maybe the new word is no clearer.

b) This is never true. Good writing never makes the writing unclear.

c) This is sometimes done, but not always.

d)  This item is true, but self evident. The answer is between a,b and d

I think d is the most practical.

I think a is what you are intended to answer.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this