Imagine that you have completed your paper. The following are two paragraphs you have written that contain direct quotations from your sources. Below each paragraph is the source used. For each source, use MLA style to create the correct in-text citation and place it in the correct place within the paragraph. Gandhi did not grow up wealthy. Of his family, he recalled, “My father never had any ambition to accumulate riches and left us very little property. He had no education, save that of experience.” Like his father, Gandhi became someone who valued experience over money. The quotation is taken from page 2 of this source: Gandhi, Mahatma. The Story of My Experiments with Truth. 1927. New York: Dover Publications, 1983. Print. Gandhi’s experiences abroad taught him a great deal, but they certainly did not make him rich. According to Indian scholar E. S. Reddy, “…on January 9, 1915, M. K. Gandhi returned to Bombay after 21 years in exile, wearing a loin cloth and travelling from London in the lowest class of the ship.” Few people suspected that this unassuming man would become one of the most powerful and beloved leaders in history. The quotation is taken from page 1 of this source: Reddy, E. S. Gandhi’s Vision of a Free South Africa. Hyderabad, India: Sangam Books, Ltd. 1995. Print.

Unit 3 big question: why did north american colonists work against british rule? what kind of government did they create after they had gained independence? section 1: short-answer questions (30 points) the american colonies were divided into four geographic regions: northern, mid-atlantic, chesapeake, and southern. using a sentence or two, describe the major economy of each region. northern: mid-atlantic chesapeake: southern:

Use the drop-down menus to answer the questions. which group contributed about half its income in taxes? the aristocracy paid of its income in taxes.

In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction