History, 04.10.2020 23:01 wwesuplexcity28

F'in December 598 (B. C.) Nebuchadnezzar left Babylon once more to campaign in the west. He þesieged Jerusalem, which had rebelled three years earlier, and on 16 March 597 it fell, King
Jehoiachin and many of his subjects were deported to Babylon and Zedekiah was installed as king of
Judah in his place. After some years Zedekiah too rebelled. The Babylonians began a siege of
Jerusalem which lasted for more than a year. The walls were finally breached in the summer of 587.
. and the city surrendered about a month later. Much of Jerusalem may have been destroyed at this
time and more Jews were deported."
-Michael Roaf,
Cultural Atlas of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East
What can you conclude about the Jews from this passage?
a. They admired Nebuchadnezzar.
b. They did not try to defend their city.
C. They were stronger than the Babylonians.
d. They wanted to be independent.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 23:20

From the soviet point of view, which reagan policy most threatened to create a new arms race? a. strategic defense initiative b. u.s. support for israel c. aid to the anti-soviet rebels in afghanistan d. iran-contra scandal

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 02:30

Did the spanish settlers and missions have a positive effect on world history? why, what did they do that was positive? why was the treaty of paris (1763) good for the world/world history? did the plymouth colony have a positive effect on world history? why, what did they do that was positive?

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 05:30

99 points explain the causes and effects of the japanese bombing of pearl harbor in 1941. make sure to explain 3 causes and 3 effect in detail.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 08:30

Read this passage: the president has asked congress to consider a new antiterrorism law. the law would give law enforcement agencies more freedom to monitor suspected terrorists' phone calls, text messages, and internet usage. the law's supporters claim that it is an essential tool to keep americans safe from terrorism. its opponents claim that it infringes on their civil liberties by stripping them of the right to privacy. which action would the party opposing the president most likely take to resolve this issue? a. encourage its members to publicly attack the law to sway public opinion against it b. begin a campaign to have the president removed from office because of his proposal c. take the matter to federal court to prevent the party from having to support it d. demand that public safety issues be left to the states rather than the federal government (apex)

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

F'in December 598 (B. C.) Nebuchadnezzar left Babylon once more to campaign in the west. He þesiege...

Questions