How does the legal precedent set by the decision in the Brown case relate to the concept of federalism? The precedent ended discrimination in the United States.
The precedent ensured that federal agencies observed the Ninth Amendment right to equality.
The precedent overturned state laws based on an interpretation of the Constitution.
The precedent amended the Constitution.

The case acted as legal precedent to concept of federalism because the state laws was overturned based on an interpretation of the Constitution.

In the case of Brown V Board, the defendant lawyer argued that segregation by law implied that African Americans were inferior to whites and asked to court to strike down segregation under the law.

The Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.

So, the case displayed the superiority given to the Constitution over the state laws.

Therefore, in conclusion, the Option C is correct since the case acted as legal precedent to concept of federalism because the state laws was overturned based on an interpretation of the Constitution.

Read more about this here

link

The precedent overturned state laws based on an interprition of the constitution yw

Explanation:

the answer is c.richard m. nixon

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this