I NEED HELP PLEASE Was the Brooks-Sumner incident a direct result of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and Bleeding Kansas or did it more accurately reflect the sectionalist and cultural division between the northern and southern United States? Provide examples to support your claim.

Was the Brooks-Sumner incident a direct result of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and Bleeding Kansas or did it more accurately reflect the sectionalist and cultural division between the northern and southern United States In his speech, Sumner used graphic depictions of violence, calling the situation in Kansas the r.a.p.e of a virgin territory and slavery in Kansas the hideous offspring of the crime. However, Sumner did not limit himself to attacking the South or slavery, he made his attack personal. First, he went after Stephen Douglas of Illinois, calling him a ''squat and nameless animal'' for his role in leading the Senate's Democrats.

Explanation:

the folsom i believe

answer: born in saint-dié, in the vosges department, france, he studied law, and was called to the bar at paris in 1854,[2] but soon went into politics, contributing to various newspapers, particularly to le temps. he attacked the second french empire with great violence, directing his opposition especially against baron haussmann, prefect of the seine department. a series of his articles in le temps was later republished as the fantastic tales of haussmannlaxupa (1868).[2]

explanation: