Refer to the map. Map of the Inca Road System in South America in the 1400's. A key notes the shaded region as the Inca Empire. Lines represent Inca roads. Major Inca cities are labeled with large dots. Which of the following statements best illustrates a difference in the administration of the economies and trade of the Aztec and Inca Empires? Aztec rulers required tribute to be paid and brought to the central location of Tenochtitlán. Inca rulers directly affected people who were using roads for transportation and communication. Aztec rulers allowed market towns to develop and thrive throughout the empire. Inca rulers required that goods be sold only at the capital, where sales and production could be monitored. Aztec rulers peacefully integrated the goods and labor of conquered people into their culture. Inca rulers used trade routes to send armies out to enforce acceptance of their authority and collect tribute. Aztec rulers used roads primarily for trade. Inca rulers used roads primarily for military influence.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

hi!

your correct answer would be a

~courtney

a

explanation: