"Do you think torture and harsh interrogation methods should be used in extreme circumstances, such as
protecting national security?"

i mean its wrong but if its like a powerful mafia leader or sumthin then maybe

This is a very person to person question. I don't think anyone can say somebody is right or wrong completely. In my personal opinion I don't think torture is an acceptable form of getting information. I understand that things like national security are important but at the end of the day we're humans not governments or businesses. Harsh interrogation is also a very vague statement, but my idea of harsh interrogation is grueling hours of constant questioning. Including common practices to make the people at the receiving of the interrogation uncomfortable. That I think is acceptable to do to someone in the example of national security.

Explanation:

I hope this is what you're looking for. I know its probably way too late for this to be useful but maybe someone else can use my answer.

he would based it upon geographic luck which he often resulted his faith in.

the answer to your question is:

strong-mayor system