subject
History, 22.10.2020 19:01 nathangirnet

How did the "rule of reason," supported by William Howard Taft, differ from Theodore Roosevelt's New Nationalism? The New Nationalism would seek government control over telephone and telegraph rates while the "rule of reason" would not.
The New Nationalism would back stronger government power to bust trusts while the "rule of reason" would weaken that power.
The New Nationalism would weaken the hard line set by the Sherman Antitrust Act while the "rule of reason" would strengthen it.
The New Nationalism would allow trusts to squeeze out smaller businesses while the "rule of thumb" would not.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
Kit carson was instructed by carleton to kill all navajo men whenever and wherever he found them, a. but carson disobeyed him. b. which carson did in a flamboyant fashion. c. so carson ordered his men to carry out the orders. d. which increased carson admiration for carleton select the best answer from the choices provided a b
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
Asupporter of the bolsheviks would most likely agree with which statement?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
How were the economies of the inca empire and ancient river valley civilizations such as egypt and phoenicia different?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 15:30
Why, once it lost china as its chief ally in asia, did the united states adopt policies to encourage the rapid recovery of japan's industrial economy.?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
How did the "rule of reason," supported by William Howard Taft, differ from Theodore Roosevelt's New...
Questions
question
Arts, 16.02.2021 22:40
question
Computers and Technology, 16.02.2021 22:40
question
Mathematics, 16.02.2021 22:40
question
Mathematics, 16.02.2021 22:40
question
Chemistry, 16.02.2021 22:40
Questions on the website: 13722367