Place these kings in order from first to rule (at the top) to last to rule (at the bottom). Reorder answers
1.King Saul
Reorder answers
2.King David
Reorder answers
3.King Solomon

king Saul-1037-1010 BCE

David- 1010–970 BCE

Solomon- 970–931 BCE

Explanation:

"The Old Testament Prophet Samuel (c. 1200–1050 BCE) is sent to Jesse of Bethlehem (a common farmer and shepherd)"  to anoint one of his sons as the new king - while Israel's first king, Saul

After seven years, David became king of a reunited Kingdom of Israel.

Because David shed much blood, God denies David the opportunity to build the temple. Before his peaceful death, he chooses his son Solomon as successor

hope this helps :P

-KB  

answer; ///i believe that the correct answer is (b)arches and domes; ///

mosques-hypostyle halls with lots of space.towers called minarets flanks the luck

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is