subject
History, 28.10.2020 18:50 nickname0097

The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. -Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Schenck v. United States (1919) Which interpretation of the Bill of RIghts does this statement illustrate?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
What was an immediate result for japan after world war i?       a.  a boosted economy      b.  a slower economy      c.  a weakened military      d.  less territory controlled by japan
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Due to seriouse dogmatic differences between the orthodox church and the western christian churches, the orthodox xhurch is not in communication with the roman catholic and protestant communities
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Which term describes a philosophy that supports representative government, human rights, and political equality? a. social contractb.liberalismc. serparation of powersd. absolute monarchy
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 12:00
The country japan fought during the sino-japanese war of 1894-1895 was
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a t...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.09.2019 22:30
question
Engineering, 03.09.2019 22:30
question
English, 03.09.2019 22:30
Questions on the website: 13722367