subject
History, 03.11.2020 21:10 Tyjon16

Periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be fatal to their necessary independence. —Alexander Hamilton,
Federalist No. 78

Why does Hamilton think judges should be appointed permanently rather than on a periodic basis?

Permanent appointments allow for greater regulation but less independence.
Periodic appointments promote a fatal independence.
Periodic appointments are hard to regulate.
Periodic appointments would destroy a judge’s independence.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Which of the following episodes led to widespread charges that president reagan was not in adequate control? a. the u.s. retreat from lebanon after the bombing deaths of 241 u.s. marines as they lay sleeping in their barracks near beirut b. the trading of arms for hostages and the illegal funding of a right-wing insurgency in the iran-contra affair c. the sale of millions of acres of public lands to private corporations by the department of interior d. the proposal to congress, year after year, of federal budgets with huge deficits that ultimately ended up tripling the national debt
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
List five north american and european countries in the non-communist bloc
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
During world war ii, which battle was the first significant us victory in the pacific?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 12:30
Amarket dominated by one seller is called a monopoly. select the best answer from the choices provided t f
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be f...
Questions
question
English, 06.11.2020 20:30
question
Mathematics, 06.11.2020 20:30
question
Mathematics, 06.11.2020 20:30
question
Mathematics, 06.11.2020 20:30
question
History, 06.11.2020 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722361