Which statement is most likely an interpretation of the Second Amendment? No one should be able to own or use a gun.
Only local governments can pass gun laws.
Bearing arms is only for the purpose of hunting.
There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

The Second Amendment to the Constitution of United States states:

"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. "

From the given options, the option D is the most likely interpretation of the second amendment i.e. There should be no limits on owning and using guns. The point highlighted in rest of the options is not listed anywhere in the amendment.

Therefore, the correct option is D.

There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

Explanation:

hope this helps you good luck! ;)

the protestant reformation's started in 1517, disturbing the religious and political order in europe´s catholic countries. the outcome was the european wars of religion prosecuted in europe in the 16th, 17th and part of the 18th century. nonetheless, uprisings, territorial disputes, and great power conflicts were also causes of the wars.  

the answer would be logic.