What makes the aqueducts different from most Roman architecture? O Their structures are admired for their beauty

They can still be seen in many places in Europe

Their design was influenced by other cultures

They were primary built for functionality

They were primary built for functionality

Explanation:

Aquaducts were Roman systems for water supplies, made so the water could be distributed to far cities and towns. They supported public baths, fountains, farms, and gardens. Romans did build aqueducts all around Europe, and they have remained largely until today. However, they are not the only Roman architectural achievements that can be seen around Europe. What is unique to them is that they are not built for beauty or with much decoration purposes, but for functionality. Romans usually used architecture to show their wealth and art, which can be seen on the remains of the houses, baths, forums, etc. Aquaducts were their purely functional invention.

on 6 november american voters will elect members of the house of representatives and the senate, which together are called congress.

both houses of congress are currently controlled by the republican party, which backs president donald trump.

the democrats think they can win control of the house of representatives this year by winning a majority of seats.

doing so would let them block or delay the president’s plans by refusing to enact them.

all 435 seats in the house of representatives are up for election.

if the democrats want to take control of the house by having the most seats, they’re going to have to claim at least 23 from the republicans.

graphic: the battle for the house of representatives