Airport Expansion Let's Move the Airport
The Stafford Metropolitan Airport should be moved, not expanded. Those of us who live near the airport have listened to the noise long enough. I'm 86 years old and the windows of my house
rattle each time one of the airplanes flles over. That just shows how little respect this city has for its senior citizens.
How does the city of Stafford expect senior citizens to pay for this so-called Improvement? Every time a business locates here, the city says we'll see the economic benefits. I don't see any
benefits. But my taxes sure keep increasing. I've never used the airport myself: I've never needed to use it. We have excellent commuter train service in our city, and the business travelers should use the train more often. Then they'd seethat we really don't need the airport at all. Let's Expand the Airport
The airport must be expanded to include more runways. As president of the airport's business association, I can say with confidence that the expanded alrport will benefit all of us. Flights to
major cities will increase. Business people can arrive faster. Once this happens, businesses will flock to our city.
Our citizens are modern-thinking people. Everyone's tax dollars may go up a few pennies. But we all know that progress costs. Which opinion has sting support? A.) the staffers metropolition airport should be moved, not expanded. B.)the Stanford metropolition must me moved. C.) neither argument has strong support

answer:   migrations were important in the neolithic period. "two major migrations passing through southeastern europe were confirmed by the means of archaeo-genetic studies."

the first migration was the early neolithic period -- 6,000 before common era (bce) -- when the first farmers, from anatolia -- asia minor -- spread through europe. the second migration occurred during the early bronze age (3,000-2,500 bce) when the so-called "steppe population," from the eurasian steppe, replaced much of northern europe's previous population.

the first farmers of northern and western europe passed through southeastern europe with limited hunter-gatherer genetic admixture, which occurs when two or more previously isolated populations begin interbreeding. however, some groups that remained mixed extensively -- without the male-biased, hunter-gatherer admixture that prevailed later in the north and west, according to latest discoveries. southeastern europe continued to be a nexus between east and west, with intermittent genetic contact with the steppe people up to 2,000 years before the migrations that replaced much of northern europe's population.

"in some places, hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers seem to have mixed very quickly," says iain mathieson, a geneticist at the university of pennsylvania, who was first author of the paper. "but, mostly, the two groups remained isolated, at least for the first few hundred years. these hunter-gatherers had been living there for thousands of years, and it must have been quite a shock to have these new people show up -- with a completely different lifestyle and appearance."

a stronger government