subject
History, 07.11.2020 08:00 19deleonl

Question 2 Which piece of evidence explains WHY early results in key battleground states were unlikely predictors of the final
result?
(You may have the article up in a different tab to help you!)

Results were not yet announced in some of the other fiercely contested and critical states on the map, including North Carolina,
Georgia and Pennsylvania.
That means the early differences between the candidates could be influenced by which type of votes - early votes or Election Day
votes - were being reported by the states.
They joined the 102 million Americans who voted days or weeks earlier.
Voter turnout was higher than in 2016 in many counties, including all of Florida, nearly every county in North Carolina and more
than 100 counties in both Georgia and Texas.
С
Next Page
Back
No

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
Which of the following best describes the relationship between the united states and south korea today?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which is guaranteed by the fifth amendment? o a person will have a speedy trial. or a person can refuse to testify against himself or herself. a person can not be forced to testify against his or her spouse. a person has the right to a trial by jury
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
What role did oregon play in the 1844 presidential election
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
Which of these was the main reason for the berlin conference? ending african civil wars spreading the christian faith economic benefits for europe new markets for european goods
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Question 2 Which piece of evidence explains WHY early results in key battleground states were unli...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.07.2019 09:00
Questions on the website: 13722361