In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of State v. Justin B. Goode. In that case, when the defense attorney cross-examined Suss Pihshawn, his goal was to question the police officer and challenge the evidence against Mr. Goode
question the police officer and challenge the evidence against the state
meet with Suss Pihshawn to discuss strategy without the jury around
meet with Suss Pihshawn to discuss what verdict he will recommend

B. question the police officer and challenge the evidence against the state

The main duty of defendants in a trial is to defend the accused from potential charges that brought by his/her oppositions. Challenging the evidence from the police/state usually being done to make that evidences become obsolete. If the defendants able to do this, the juries would see the defendant more favorably.

Explanation:

i am pretty sure it is a

who was the head of the bureau who was the head of the bureau