A mutation causes a dog to be born with a tail that is shorter than normal. Which best describes this mutation? It is harmful because it obviously affects the dog’s survival. It is harmful because it affects the dog’s physical appearance. It is neutral because it does not obviously affect the dog’s survival. It is beneficial because it affects the dog’s physical appearance.

It is neutral because it does not obviously affect the dog’s survival.

Explanation:

How would this definitively affect their rate of survival? I know it is a rhetorical question, but unless dogs rely only upon their tails for communication within the species (or something of the sort), I don't see the help or harm in it.

i just did something on this guy a few days a go give me two minutes to find it in my notes.

answer by yourhope:

the speaker of which statement would be best served by joining an interest group?

i want politicians to make more of an effort for lgbt rights!

: )