A man claiming to be working to fight against fraud has been posting threatening comments on Twitter. Widely considered the place for free speech, Twitter has, instead, banned the posts. The man claims infringement on his freedom of speech. What do you say? Using recent newspaper articles, the Internet and other local press outlets, discuss the matter. What do you consider is protected under the Freedom of Speech amendment? When does that speech go too far? Is Twitter obligated to post the man’s tweets? Persuasively argue both sides of the issue, then give your opinion. Make certain you ground your opinion rather than give an emotional response. Find other precedents, or cite the Constitution to ground your opinion. This essay should be 250-350 words. CAN SOMEONE PLZ HELP!! I HAVE TO GET THIS TURNED IN TO DAY OR I WILL FEEL IT I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST

we dont have any resources to answer this.

Explanation:

hi friend   look late me tall   you with my experience first politic because this subject   it is more politic than be religious   and also give you my experience in islam

first   the islam it is not religion order to kill for we be clear .

so bin laden he not was man of religion   for he use they taught sound islamic theology.

osama bin laden he was influenced by mullah mohammad omar, a very radical manosama bin laden's little understanding of religion has made osama bin laden's speech radical and deviated from the teachings of islam

so the answer > they used radical persuasive rhetoric

because its important to learn about other countries and how high tech they are compared to us. also its good to learn about other cultures and how ours differs and in common also we need to learn about companies that we still buy since they ship it here.