Several hundred people attend a peaceful political rally in a park. The police stop the rally, then arrest several people and search them. During the search, the police find no evidence of lawbreaking. However, they take everyone's cell phones and cameras and put the people in jail for "disorderly behavior." The people who were arrested think this was done to prevent the news from reporting what happened. They also think that their rights were violated. Which amendment will their lawyer likely use to argue their case? Amendment I, which safeguards Americans' right to free speech
Amendment II, which safeguards Americans' right to bear arms
Amendment VI, which safeguards Americans' right to an attorney
Amendment VII, which safeguards Americans' right to trial by jury

Amendment I

Explanation:

Even though this is unlikely to happen, ammendment 1 would be the best choice because the first ammendment protects the right of the people to peacefully assemble so a lawyer could state that the police had no right to arrest or detain them because it is their constitutional right to protest peacefully.

- "made the south's economy grow rapidly and a small effect that a lot of people don't know is that it made the more demand of slaves and cotton products. and also new states formed due to plantations growing in size."

< 3

peasants’ war, (1524–25) peasant uprising in germany inspired by changes brought by the reformation, peasants in western and southern germany invoked   divine law to demand agrarian rights and freedom from oppression by nobles and landlords. as the uprising spread, some peasant groups organized armies. although the revolt was supported huldrych zwingli and thomas müntzerits condemnation by martain luther contributed to its defeat, principally by the army of the swabian league. some 100,000 peasants were killed. reprisals and increased restrictions discouraged further attempts to improve the peasants’ plight.

i think it would be " a" i might be wrong tho